<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>My Corner &#187; Hannah Montana</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.spencerkellis.net/tag/hannah-montana/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.spencerkellis.net</link>
	<description>An experiment in writing of life as I live it</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2010 18:24:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>In Which Elephants Fly and I (almost) Turn My Head at Nearly 1,000mph</title>
		<link>http://blog.spencerkellis.net/2009/06/in-which-elephants-fly-and-i-almost-turn-my-head-at-nearly-1000mph/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.spencerkellis.net/2009/06/in-which-elephants-fly-and-i-almost-turn-my-head-at-nearly-1000mph/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 14:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Spencer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afterburner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Airshow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C-17]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elephant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-16]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hannah Montana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trigonometry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spencerkellis.net/?p=26</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wonder if perhaps the designers of the C-17 started with a picture of an elephant (Dumbo, for instance), attached wings with a little uptick at the ends, raised the tail, and called it the C-17 Globemaster.  The thing is a beast, but I have to tell you&#8211;it was one of the most graceful, impressive [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="lightbox-elephant" href="http://blog.spencerkellis.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/20090606-150905-1293.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-27" title="C-17 Globemaster" src="http://blog.spencerkellis.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/20090606-150905-1293-300x200.jpg" alt="C-17 Globemaster" width="300" height="200" /></a>I wonder if perhaps the designers of the C-17 started with a picture of an elephant (Dumbo, for instance), attached wings with a little uptick at the ends, raised the tail, and called it the C-17 Globemaster.  The thing is a beast, but I have to tell you&#8211;it was one of the most graceful, impressive demonstrations at the airshow.  It landed in 3,000 feet of runway.  For a plane that size, you might as well land in my non-existent driveway.  It was absolutely amazing.  I don&#8217;t know how many tons of metal floated like a hammer (on the moon) to the runway, and seemed to stop almost immediately.</p>
<p>Then it taxied backwards.  And did a 3-point turn inside the 200-ft width of the runway.</p>
<p>That pilot is my new hero, because I can barely parallel park my 15-ft Honda Accord.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s just say: I&#8217;m a newly admiring fan of the C-17.</p>
<p><a rel="lightbox-elephant" href="http://blog.spencerkellis.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/20090606-133919-1471.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-28" title="F-16" src="http://blog.spencerkellis.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/20090606-133919-1471-300x199.jpg" alt="F-16" width="300" height="199" /></a>After the C-17 there were F-16s.  My D300 was set to 6fps, and I chattered away every time they flew over.  Even with the best of technology, however, one should note a basic limitation of the standard photographer&#8211;the rate at which he or she is able to rotate skull and gray matter atop a spinal column, taking into effect the extra drag of a DSLR with a telephoto lens.  You&#8217;ll note the effects in the second photo on the right.  My max rotational speed appears to be slightly less than the required (slightly less than) 1,000mph.</p>
<p>(For the technically astute out there, no, I&#8217;m not going to use my vast store of trigonometric identities to translate the jet&#8217;s speed to the rotational speed of my head.)</p>
<p>The airshow was awesome.  I don&#8217;t know how else to describe it.  There aren&#8217;t many things in this world I&#8217;m willing to trade for experiences like getting off that base&#8211;2 hours in the hot sun and unmoving lines.  But two Thunderbirds (F-16s) thundering barely a few hundred feet overhead at afterburner is enough to make me scream and melt like a teenage girl at a Hannah Montana concert.  My chest, my whole body shook with the sound and shockwave.  It was exhilarating.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll have more to say about the airshow in upcoming posts.  Check out <a href="http://photography.spencerkellis.net/index.php?photo_id=15">this photo</a> for now.  The tails on those F-16s look to be about 5 feet apart, which is more like a half-inch when you consider the speed at which they&#8217;re traveling.  Those guys are insane!</p>
<p>(Yes, mom, I put on sunscreen.  Almost everywhere!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.spencerkellis.net/2009/06/in-which-elephants-fly-and-i-almost-turn-my-head-at-nearly-1000mph/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

