
HTC Imagio
I purchased the HTC Imagio (on Verizon) the day it came out. I had been steadily following the reviews and it looked like the perfect phone. Wi-Fi, GPS, Bluetooth, Verizon’s 3G network, FM receiver, huge touch screen, and TouchFLO, HTC’s interface to Windows Mobile.
I wanted to love this phone. I just couldn’t. Returning to my iPod Touch was like being reunited with an old friend.
I thought it might be useful to give a detailed review of what worked for me and what didn’t; why, in the end, I returned the phone.
The Good
HTC’s TouchFLO interface is generally very well done. The front screen, shown above, is really nice. You get a nice big clock, the weather, call information, and upcoming appointments all in one place. Along the bottom you can quickly see if there are emails or texts waiting to be read.
The screen is beautiful. It’s large so you can fit quite a lot on it. It’s vibrant and colorful. It’s easy to look at.
The phone itself just feels good. It’s the right size and weight, and the case is solid. There’s a 3.5mm jack for using normal headphones (more and more common these days, but still nice).
The on-screen keyboard was fine. Friends who tried it out didn’t like it, but I had no problems. The XT9 technology makes typing on virtual keyboards basically painless.
The TouchFLO contacts integration is very well done. Information such as profile pictures can be pulled from Facebook. You can see in one place all text messages you’ve shared, all emails, appointments, events for each contact.
I loved the camera and I especially loved the video recording. I’ve never had a mobile camera (that was any good anyway), so this was a new experience for me. I could get used to it.
The Bad
Here’s a list of my grievances:
- The processor in the phone is ancient and it shows. Opening applications takes forever (notably, mobile outlook), switching applications takes forever, and sometimes the phone just isn’t responsive. You can never tell whether you’ve pressed something incorrectly without just waiting. Scrolling in any context – text, websites, pictures, etc. – is slow and jerky.
- I really dislike the overall email solution which is sad given the importance of email to the whole smartphone experience. As you can see in this picture (from pocketnow), the TouchFLO email interface is an envelop with letters sticking out. This seems fancy and slick, but there are some problems.
- The slanted edges of the envelope hide text from the middle of sentences and makes previewing the email annoying. To read the full email, you have to open mobile outlook. SLOW.
- The character set is messed up so that HTML email messages and anything else other than standard text will show the uncomfortable-looking empty box-characters for unknown ASCII codes.
- The direction for flicking your finger across the screen to move between messages is opposite in the email interface what it is in the text messaging interface. This may seem trivial, but if you flick the wrong direction on the first email, it automatically loads mobile outlook – and outlook takes forever to load.
- There is no way to mark a message read from the preview screen (you have to open the email in mobile outlook – recall yet again the bit about it being slow. Seeing a pattern here?).
- Mobile outlook is just painful. It’s slow both to open and operate. It’s not finger friendly. It is painful on the eyes. I couldn’t customize which folders held deleted messages or sent messages, and the default setting was different from all three of my email accounts – so, for instance, when I deleted emails on the phone, I had to delete them again in gmail from this new folder that just showed up.
- I dislike the music and picture and video interfaces. The visual media interface (like the email) tries too hard to be “slick” and ends up just taking up too much space and displaying pictures/videos that much smaller. The music interface was just terrible. I could never tell what group of songs I was playing from. Because the processor was so slow, I hated trying to flip between songs. The phone couldn’t even play music smoothly in the background while performing other operations – even the non-multi-tasking ipod touch can do that.
- There are two competing interfaces for reading and sending text messages. This wasn’t necessarily bad in and of itself; the problem is that it seemed completely random which one would come up. The TouchFLO text messaging interface is really well done. I loved it. It was fast, it looked good, and it was easy to use. The Windows Mobile text messaging interface is terrible. It’s basically mobile outlook with all the inherent problems, including being slow to open and navigate. Hard to believe HTC allowed that Windows Mobile interface to survive at all.
- I actually had to get involved in memory management. If I didn’t reboot the phone for a week or so, the memory baseline (e.g., all applications closed) would hit up around 85-90% utilization and everything would slow down (even more) considerably. I cannot imagine a “normal” person (I mean non-nerd), for instance my mother, owning this phone and having to deal with memory management on a regular basis.
- I really missed having a dedicated power button to put the phone to sleep. I had to lock it (only available from the home screen, or depress the “end call” button for three seconds then select that option from the menu) and then just wait for the screen to turn off.
- It is impossible to have the phone set to vibrate and the music playback volume set to anything other than silent at the same time. This is very frustrating when you want to listen to music but forget that turning up the volume for the music turns up the volume on the ringer as well. I got some nasty surprises from this issue. Note that when you change the volume, you can change the system volume and ringer volume separately – so they can be at two different audible levels. You just can’t have one vibrate and the other audible.
The End
In the end, the contrast between the TouchFLO interface and Windows Mobile was just too much. It’s like living with Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde in your pocket, and never knowing which will appear when you wake up the phone. This problem is only compounded by the slow processor, since mistakes generally mean you wait.
So, after nearly a month of use, I begrudgingly called Verizon and returned the phone. To Verizon’s credit, it couldn’t have been easier. The CSR gave me zero problems and was actually very understanding. The return shipping label was included in the original shipping. I put everything back in the box, affixed the label, and dropped it in a Fedex dropoff. Several days later I called back up, verified the credits to my account, and everything was done. The reps in every instance were respectful and courteous. (This is the main reason we switched from Cingular back in the day, and it’s one of the main reasons we stay with Verizon – they seem to be willing to bend over backwards to help me no matter the problem).
HTC has another Windows Mobile 6.5 phone, the HD2, with supposedly much better specs – in particular, a Snapdragon 1GHz processor and a larger capacitive touch screen. Considering my experience with the Imagio however, the slow processor is only part of the problem. The real problem is an inconsistent user interface that plagues bottom-line usability of the device. As nice as that HD2 looks, I’d be wary of the actual user experience.
The Future
So… Droid anyone?










#1 by Jeff Pedersen on November 18th, 2009
So as a former owner of 5 different windows mobile phones, in fact I remember when they ran windows CE, wow Im old. anywhoose, Interesting stuff. The sad thing about the user interface is the only nice and usable part is the part HTC coded on top of the windows kernel. It is so sad that windows mobile cant come up with a good mobile OS, once again they had major market share once they squashed palm, but they blew it by being unoriginal, and adding too many functions without, a good user experience. Too bad the droid sales are dismal though, verizon just said they are gonna put their hopes on the palm finally to unseat the iphone. But I do have to say the Droid marketing campaign and verizon vs AT&T 3G commercials have been brilliant. Island of misfit toys. Priceless……..
#2 by Spencer on November 18th, 2009
i can’t believe you’ve had 5 windows mobile phones! how has your experience been? any touchscreen phones?
i’m also curious where you read about verizon putting their hopes on palm. i’ve read about the droid sales (250k in the first week right?) which, while not iphone sales (1.6m), are actually pretty high and 4x what the palm pre sold (60k). and of course there are all the arguments of the user base, the apple brand recognition, etc… i guess i thought the droid did pretty well all things considered. i may actually get one myself.
#3 by chiks on November 28th, 2009
Slow?? I have the iphone and the HTC Pure. From what I know the HTC pure and Imagio share the same processor. The outlook is not at all slow. One tap on the email message takes you straight to the inbox. The music also keeps on playing in the background with no problems. Dude….you love the iphone (n problems on that), but stop flaming other platforms. How about the simple fact that just by chance(a slim one) you have an iphone with the best processor, and the imagio with the worst processor off the line? That could result in responsiveness that you see.
#4 by Spencer on November 28th, 2009
While I appreciate the ideas you shared, I take some issue with the tone of your comment. This article describes my own personal experience with a phone which I bought, used for a month, and returned because it did not live up to my expectations. I believe in and respect your right to personal opinions and experience, and likewise cannot allow you to judge or discount me or my personal experience. In my judgment the tone of your comment breaks down the common rules of etiquette that should govern personal interaction regardless of whether it’s spoken or written.
I decided to approve your comment for the sake of being open and engaging in a discussion that may be useful to future readers. I hope you will show more respect in future comments.
In that spirit, I thought I might just address a few of your points.
The Pure and Imagio do indeed share the same processor, a Qualcomm MSM7200A running at 528Mhz. From what I can tell (I hadn’t looked much at the Pure before now since it’s an AT&T phone) the Imagio runs a newer version of TouchFLO but otherwise they seem about the same. Outside of TouchFLO, it’s likely that the Pure offers a very similar experience to the Imagio, but I haven’t used one so can’t make any conclusions there.
It’s good that you are comfortable with the performance of mobile outlook on your phone; I was not. Unfortunately for me, I tapped on a message from the TouchFLO interface and had to wait a long time. Perhaps my “long time” is your “fast” – who knows. It didn’t work for me.
I never said the music wouldn’t play in the background. I did say it wouldn’t play smoothly, which was true. Music stuttered for me. (Never once had that problem on my iPod; granted it’s not a phone. I’d be curious to know if you’ve had any problems on your iPhone?). Another potential problem was playing music off an older micro SD card. Could be the card was just slow. That wasn’t the deciding factor in returning the phone, but it would be interesting to see if it made a difference.
I don’t have an iPhone; I have an iPod Touch (2G). Right now I don’t have any smartphone (including the iPhone). As far as people can tell, the iPod Touch (2G) has a Samsung ARM processor running at 533MHz (check Wikipedia on that: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPod_Touch#Specifications). It’s impossible to compare apples to apples on that point since they’re completely different processors, but it’s not the newer ARM Cortex-A8 in the latest iPod Touch revisions. I certainly wish it were. It’s a processor that runs the same or similar instruction set at about the same frequency, introduced a year or so later than the MSM7200A. It’s likely that the iPod Touch processor performs slightly better on paper (I say that mainly because it’s newer), but I couldn’t find any detailed information from a quick Google search.
Regardless, it’s unlikely that my complaints regarding responsiveness are due to using a fast processor on my iPod Touch vs. the “worst processor” (your words…) on the HTC Imagio. My honest opinion is that the OS and firmware written for the iPod sacrificed functionality for smooth operation. Take for evidence that there is no task switching, no memory management, no status/messaging like the alerts in Windows Mobile, lack of very detailed control over radios, etc… the list goes on. It’s a tradeoff. It’s every consumer’s right in our economy to choose the balance of performance and features they will exchange for their money.
I take issue with your insinuation that I simply “love the iphone” and “flame other platforms”. I was careful to list both pros and cons of the HTC Imagio. There were a lot of things I liked. I’m not trying to “flame” anything. In fact, if you read through the rest of my blog, you’ll see several articles that defend Windows platforms (see http://blog.spencerkellis.net/2009/09/the-vastly-improved-windows-7-update-process/ and http://blog.spencerkellis.net/2009/06/a-short-overview-of-the-hp-ex485-mediasmart-server/). However, I’ve got no qualms about describing problems I’ve had with a product. Flaming in my mind is unsubstantiated rhetoric. My list of grievances was based on a month of actually using the device.
I bought the HTC Imagio because of my belief that it would be great smartphone; in other words, if anything I began using it biased *towards* liking it, not biased towards looking for problems and flaming the thing. It was in my best interest to like it and keep it. I use mobile devices for just a few things (I’m not a business user): wireless communication (email, text, facebook, etc.), music, games, and video. I hold to my conclusion that the Apple iPod Touch is a better implementation of mobile technology than the HTC Imagio in the context of these applications. If Windows Mobile 7 makes the substantial UI improvements it’s rumored to, I’ll happily accept it and use it.
#5 by chiks on November 28th, 2009
Thank you for a very extensive response to my quick outburst to your review. I am a man of few words and in general do not take sides. If somebody is happy with their choice, I do not go about telling them that they made a poor choice, and that they have a better choice out there.
That said, you are free to write about your experience, and it is certainly appreciated in this new age world. My outburst came about simply because I felt that the Touchflo 3D on the WinMo 6.5 platform deserved better than to be written off like you happened to do.
Was I wrong to do so? Maybe.
Was my assumption that you probably got a bad Imagio wrong? probably not. I say this because I test drove the HTC Pure at an AT&T store and then got one. Both perform just as good. On top of that, I have 3 email accounts loaded -1 hotmail with immediate refresh, 1 POP3 account and 1 exchange server that has my daily calendar synchronized and work email. When you say you had to “wait” for the email to show up, it indicates a few seconds at the very least. When I click on the envelope, my message detail comes up under a second. I agree it does not come up with the screen transitions that the iphone has. But slow? definitely not. That is why I felt deep down that this review was biased towards the iphone. Don’t take me wrong. I have nothing personal against you. I do applaud you however to take the time out to write a review of a product and contribute to the knowledge base of this vast internet world.
Thanks!
#6 by Jonathan on December 9th, 2009
I had evaluated the HTC Imagio with WinMo 6.5 for about 10 days for possible use in our enterprise. I was previously using a Blackberry Storm, and was reasonably impressed with my initial experience. I ordered one for an extended trial which arrived yesterday.
Now that I have my phone number on the phone and I’m taking calls. I’m starting to notice the chinks in the armor. The sound management is non-existent. For years Blackberry phones have had sound profiles that you can select based on your current situation. These allow you to have audible alerts for phone calls only, change the volume for a particular caller, or create your own profile like all alerts off unless it comes from a particular source. With WinMo it’s basically all or nothing. You can’t change the volume for a particular notification, or the alert sound for a text message from a particular coworker, or choose to have all emails and text alerts to be silent, but phone calls to be audible. This really needs addressed before the 7.0. There doesn’t even seem to be a downloadable app to fix this!
I agree with Spencer that the email interface is a bit buggy and for me a little slow. I don’t know if I feel it’s better or worse than Blackberry. Simply having access to the various Outlook folders is very nice (this has never worked well with BB).
Despite having specified that I want all attachments to download, it still does not unless I select that on each email with an attachment. Even then it does not grab the attachment until the next time it receives mail (not checks for mail…it has to receive mail).
With Blackberry and our Blackberry Enterprise Server, mail arrives in Outlook on the PC and on the phone virtually simultaneously. My Imagio is tied directly into Exchange, but there is still a fair amount of delay.
I like that Word, Excel, PowerPoint and Acrobat apps that are preinstalled, that’s pretty huge. It has a built-in RDP client. I mean, freaking RDP! I was able to control one of my servers from my phone! That was cool. Not an easy desktop experience, but in an emergency it will do.
I could probably go on ad infinitem about the pros and cons. I think I’m going to give it some more time. With the BB Storm, it probably took 8-10 OS updates before I really felt the phone was usable, but I was pretty happy in the end. It’s my sincere hope that will be the case with WinMo 6.5.
#7 by Adrian on January 1st, 2010
I had very high hopes for the HTC Imagio. Initially, I liked the device based off of pure cosmetics (the form factor and the HTC interface). Plus the specs on paper seemed to be pretty nice as well. Amongst all of the DROID hype and being a current BB Storm user I was pro-Imagio all the way. I ordered the device here just recently and it was a little bit of a disappointment. I’m not not new to WinMo as I’ve carried devices like the Motorola Q and the XV6800 (which at the time I thought was pretty nice), so I did noticed the improvements made with 6.5. But downside was that the HTC Imagio hits a homerun when it comes to looks, but when you start getting into the performance side of things you begin to see “chinks in the armor” as an earlier poster put it. Palm’s WebOs, Android, Apple, and even ironically Blackberry seem to be working toward advancing the mobile OS industry but WinMo seems to be getting trampled in this race. The TouchFLO3D via HTC is very nice, but once you get past that I’m reminded of WinMo 5.0. My Hotmail emails weren’t pushing regularly and I wasn’t too impressed with the Opera web browser. The music player was kinda disappointing too. The was several hiccups when scrolling through my list and the album cover feature wouldn’t even display the correct artist. Plus it seemed to recognize only certain music formats which my Storm didn’t seem to discriminate. Just seems like WinMo doesn’t provide the conveniences of the other OS’s offered on the market today. The other beef was the resistive touchscreen. I would have liked the capacitive screen. The virtual keyboard wasn’t too bad but I found it more accurate when I used the stylus. Maybe I’m just use to my Storm but I felt like it was taking a step backwards having to use a stylus. So what I initially that would be a ridiculously nice phone I found myself boxing my Imagio up to send back to Verizon and wanting to wait for the supposed Android version of the HTC HD2 that is said to hit Verizon soon. I like HTC as a manufacturer and they have done an excellent job on the hardware side of things for the HTC Imagio but the device’s guts are crippled with a OS that hasn’t made a significant stride to improve its functionality. I’m not saying that WinMo has to jump on the 16 billion apps availability bandwagon, I’m just saying that it would have been nice to have the level of responsiveness that is resident on the other mobile OS’s on the market. I haven’t had a chance to experience Palm’s new WebOS but I have definitely played around with the Android, Blackberry and Apple OS’s which at least two of the three seem to be raising the bar on the mobile industry. At this point, WinMo seems to be getting left behind. Maybe a great business solution, but for the average smartphone user doesn’t provide much wow-factor.
#8 by Stephen Buck on March 2nd, 2010
I literally hated my HTC Pure until….I disabled TouchFLO and Opera. TouchFLO follows a very long lineage of people who think they can slap together a snazzy front end to replace the Windows shell. This was happening since the beginning of time with Windows desktop software and the offerings were never able to make all use cases smooth and transparent. The end result is that ALL 3rd-party shells cause users to click more than they have to. More clicks equal worse user experience….even if the 3rd-party shells look cooler. Now my phone is fast, sleek, and simple….everything I wanted. My final problems are the fact that Windows explorer does not use the back button consistently with the rest of the apps on the phone…which normally means go to the previous app, not the last web page, so getting back to another app from explorer takes extra clicks on the screen requiring unnecessary dexterity. Plus IE doesn’t paint properly on many web pages until you resize.